When cell phones are tested by the manufacturers for compliance, they do so with a separation between the phone and the body so that they remain compliant with FCC (and other European bodies) guidelines , cell phones were never designed to be carried right up against the body yet most phone users are unaware of this very important safety warning which is buried within their mobile phone under ‘Legal”.
The FCC and other European bodies have set a so-called ‘safe’ limit for RF exposure from cell phones which is currently 1.6W/kg although it should be noted this limit was set back in 1993 on a phantom head modelled on a male marine soldier and not the average size/weight of most users. There was no consideration of a child’s size /weight when this limit was set
In order for a cell phone manufacturer to meet FCC guidelines, the measured SAR of the phone must be below 1.6W/kg –to remain under this limit, the cell phone manufacturers test their phones at various distances from the body. During compliance testing, cell phone manufacturers adjust the distance required until the ‘safe’ limit is met, the cell phone instruction manual will then state the specified distance to keep their phone from the body so that this limit is met.
World Health Organisation
It should be noted that in a press release in 2011 the World Health Organisation the IARC CLASSIFIES RADIOFREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS AS POSSIBLY CARCINOGENIC TO HUMANS
Lyon, France, May 31, 2011 ‐‐ The WHO/International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B), based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer1, associated with wireless phone use
Below are the specified distances from the largest manufacturers
Depending on the device (https://support.apple.com/en_AU/manuals/iphone) , Apple instructs users to “Carry iPhone at least [5-10] mm away from your body to ensure exposure levels remain at or below the as-tested levels. Cases with metal parts may change the Radio Frequency (RF) performance of the device, including its compliance with RF exposure guidelines, in a manner that has not been tested or certified.”
Go to Settings > General > About > Legal > RF Exposure to see this information for your model.
The Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) information for the Samsung Galaxy S7 (http://www.samsung.com/sar/sarMain/) notes the following: “Body-worn SAR testing has been carried out at a separation distance of 1.5 cm. To meet RF exposure guidelines during body-worn operation, the device should be positioned at least this distance away from the body.
“Organizations such as the World Health Organization and the US Food and Drug Administration have suggested that if people are concerned and want to reduce their exposure, they could use a hands-free accessory to keep the wireless device away from the head and body during use, or reduce the amount of time spent using the device.”
The Legal Guide for the Moto G (3rdGeneration)
“For optimal device performance, and to stay within the RF exposure guidelines:
When using the mobile phone next to your body (other than in your hand or against your head), maintain a distance of 1.5 cm (3/4 inch) from your body to be consistent with how the mobile phone is tested for compliance with RF exposure requirements.”
Go to Settings > About phone > Legal information to see RF information for your model.
The BlackBerry Classic (http://help.blackberry.com/pt/content/sib/classic/sqc100-1/Safety_and_product_information_sqc100-1_EN.html) safety and product information states: “To maintain compliance with FCC, EU, and other relevant international radio frequency exposure guidelines and limits, keep the smartphone at least 0.59 in. (1.5 cm) away from your body. To reduce radio frequency exposure: (i) use the smartphone in areas where there is a strong wireless signal; (ii) use hands-free options; and (iii) reduce the amount of time spent on calls or send an email, text message, or BBM message instead.”
The SAR guidelines (https://support.microsoft.com/en-au/help/12673/mobile-devices-sar-information) for the Nokia Lumia 950 state: “This device meets RF exposure guidelines when used against the head or when positioned at least 1.5 cm away from the body. When a carry case, belt clip or other forms of device holder is used for body-worn operation, it should not contain metal and should provide at least the above-stated separation distance from the body.”
Cell phone manufacturers instruct users to carry the phone at least 5-15mm away from body to ensure radiation levels remain at or below the as-tested levels.
What the US & France are doing about cell phone radiation
Berkeley in the US http://www.saferemr.com/2014/11/berkeley-cell-phone-right-to-know.html?m=1 (as well as Maine & Hawaii) are making warnings about mobile phone radiation easily visible at the point of sale when all mobile phones are purchased as well as on the phone’s packaging. The Berkeley ordinance which required retailers to display warnings about mobile phone radiation at the point of sale was challenged twice already by telco’s and just now has been upheld http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2017/10/11/appeals-court-wont-reconsider-challenge-to-berkeley-cellphone-warnings-law/
With the recent French ‘Phonegate’ scandal which saw the National Frequency Agency in France having to disclose (under court order) the fact that 9 out of 10 mobile phones exceeded the government radiation levels https://ehtrust.org/cell-phone-radiation-scandal-french-government-data-indicates-cell-phones-exposeconsumers-radiation-levels-higher-manufacturers-claim/ the issue of cell phone radiation is once again back in the media.
Experts find “clear evidence” of cancer from cell phone radiation in NTP study https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/experts-find-clear-evidence-cancer-from-cell-phone-ntp-joel-moskowitz/
Recent studies into the health effects from cell phones
The concept of the Cellsafe invention
Knowing most cell phone users are unaware of the potential risks associated with exceeding the so-called ‘safe’ limits of RF exposure, we developed the Radi-Chip
The Radi Chip® ensures your radiation exposure level is reduced to the same manufacturer ‘as-tested levels’ even when you keep the phone at zero distance from your head. Refer to the diagram below.
Without Cellsafe® – When holding the phone at 10mm distance from the head the radiation exposure (SAR) is reduced by 41.6%
With Cellsafe®. When holding the phone at 0mm distance from the head the radiation exposure (SAR) is reduced by 51.55%
The CONCLUSION – Fitting a Cellsafe® Radi Chip to your phone reduces SAR to equivalent or LOWER levels (at 0mm distance) as would be achieved holding the bare phone 5-10mm away from the head.
About the Cellsafe Technology
The Cellsafe® Radi Chip™s patented technology consists of multiple layers of specially formulated microwave absorbing materials, combined with a specially engineered passive inductive directional RF coupler. These layers absorb most of the transmitted RF signal from the mobile phone’s antenna while the RF coupler controls and disperse the signal towards the back of the phone. These layers are sprayed in a form of micro-sized particles. The composition is adjusted perfectly to absorb the maximum and equal signal power for the range of transmitted frequency bands from the phones antenna/s.
These layers and our specially designed passive inductive directional RF coupler, act to disperse the majority of the signal absorbed towards the back of the phone.
Devices which claim to act as ‘shields’ may significantly interfere with the normal operation of the phone. Reduced or redirected transmission levels caused by such shielding products can interfere with call reception and quality and may also cause calls to drop out. The Radi Chip technology has been scientifically tested and proven not to interfere with the transmission signal or with call reception, unlike these ‘shielding’ devices.
All of this is designed to achieve a better result than just keeping the phone away from users head or body (as recommended by the manufacturers).
Here is a link to a short promotional video which explains our technology and how it works in layman’s terms https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ot2qDKpcAKE&feature=youtu.be and also our latest Television commercial
Here you can find the full patent specifications which describe in detail the invention and the manufacturing process https://cellsafe.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Publication-of-Granted-Patent.pdf )
Our US Patent has now been granted VIEW the full Patent Specifications here https://cellsafe.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Publication-of-Granted-Patent.pdf )
We have just received advice our European Patent has just been granted, and our Australian patent is currently in its final stages of acceptance.
Full Test Reports – SAR and Signal Strength Testing
Links to download the test reports for the full range of Radi-Chips in full can be found here https://cellsafe.com/distributor-table/
All Cellsafe products have been scientifically tested at accredited laboratories to determine the level of radiation (SAR) reduction. We also test the signal strength of the phone to ensure there is no reduction in the phone’s performance when the Cellsafe Radi-Chip is applied. Reducing the SAR is the easy part, reducing the SAR without having a negative effect on the phone’s performance is the hard part!
Below is a summary table of all Cellsafe Radi-Chip models and the highest percentage of SAR reduction achieved.
* For Mobile and Tablet Scroll left and right to see the full data of the table below.
|Summary of SAR Reduction for Cellsafe Radi-Chips|
|Cellsafe – iPhone Range||Model / SKU||Laboratory||Report||Device Tested||Measured SAR of bare phone||Measured SAR when chip is applied||% of SAR Reduction when Radi-Chip is Applied|
|Radi-Chip iPhone 5,5S||RCHIPIP/S||EMC||M140907||iPhone 5S||0.448||0.022||95.10%|
|Radi-Chip iPhone 6, 6S||RCHIPIP6S/S||RF EXPOSURE||SAR.20160801||iPhone 6||0.642||0.030||95.33%|
|Radi-Chip iPhone 6+, 6S+||RCHIPIP6S+/S||SEIMEC||16070194T-CE-H||iPhone 6+||0.548||0.004||99.30%|
|Radi-Chip iPhone 7 / 8||RCHIPIP7/S||EMC||M161013||iPhone 7||0.473||0.065||86.30%|
|Radi-Chip iPhone 7+||RCHIPIP7+/S||EMC||M161013||iPhone 7+||0.128||0.028||87.20%|
|Radi-Chip iPhone 8+/X||RCHIPIPX/S||NS7N0803||iPhone X||0.15||0.012||92.00%|
|Cellsafe – Android Radi-Chips||Model / SKU||Laboratory||Report||Device Tested||Measured SAR of bare phone||Measured SAR when chip is applied||% of SAR Reduction when Radi-Chip is Applied|
|Radi-Chip Samsung Galaxy S4, S5 (Older Style Android)||RCHIPAN/BK||EMC||M140907||Samsung Galaxy S4||0.162||0.011||93.20%|
|Radi-Chip Samsung Galaxy S4, S5 (Older Style Android)||RCHIPAN/BK||MORLAB||SZ14060084S02||Samsung Galaxy S5||0.512||0.080||84.38%|
|Radi-Chip Samsung Galaxy S4, S5 (Older Style Android)||RCHIPAN/BK||MORLAB||SZ14060084S02||HTC One M8||0.343||0.020||94.16%|
|Radi-Chip Samsung Galaxy S4, S5 (Older Style Android)||RCHIPAN/BK||MORLAB||SZ14060084S02||Blackberry 8700||0.807||0.128||84.13%|
|Radi-Chip Samsung Galaxy S4, S5 (Older Style Android)||RCHIPAN/BK||MORLAB||SZ14060084S02||Nokia XL||0.443||0.109||75.39%|
|Radi-Chip Universal – Samsung Galaxy S6, S6E, S7, S7E, S8, S8+, S9, S9+, Note 8, Note 9, Oppo, Huawei||RCHIPUNI/S||SPORTON||FA753113||Samsung Galaxy S7||0.106||0.015||85.84%|
|Radi-Chip Universal – Samsung Galaxy S6, S6E, S7, S7E, S8, S8+, S9, S9+, Note 8, Note 9, Oppo, Huawei||RCHIPUNI/S||SPORTON||FA753113||Samsung Galaxy S7E||0.042||0.005||88.09%|
|Radi-Chip Universal – Samsung Galaxy S6, S6E, S7, S7E, S8, S8+, S9, S9+, Note 8, Note 9, Oppo, Huawei||RCHIPUNI/S||SPORTON||FA753113||Samsung Galaxy S8||0.224||0.055||75.55%|
|RCHIPUNI/S||SPORTON||FA753113||Samsung Galaxy S8+||0.066||0.017||74.24%|
|RCHIPUNI/S||SPORTON||NS832114||Samsung Galaxy S9||0.086||0.049||43.00%|
|RCHIPUNI/S||SPORTON||NS832114||Samsung Galaxy S9+||0.146||0.014||86.30%|
|RCHIPUNI/S||SPORTON||NS7O1113_R01||Samsung Galaxy Note 8||0.101||0.008||92.07%|
|RCHIPUNI/S||SPORTON||TBA||Samsung Galaxy Note 9||0.144||0.017||88.00%|
|iPad Radi-Chips||Model||Laboratory||Report||Device Tested||Measured SAR of device||Measured SAR when chip is applied||% of SAR Reduction with the Radi-Chips applied.|
|Radi-Chip Ipad 3G/4G||RCHIPIPD/3&4G||MORLAB||SZ15040012S01||iPad Mini 3||0.941||0.191||79.11%|
|Radi-Chip Ipad 3G/4G||RCHIPIPD/3&4G||MORLAB||SZ15040012S01||iPad 5||0.942||0.205||78.24%|
|Radi-Chip Ipad 3G/4G||RCHIPIPD/3&4G||MORLAB||SZ15040012S01||iPad Air 2||1.43||0.176||87.69%|
|Rad-Chip iPad Wi-Fi||RCHIPIPD/WF||MORLAB||SZ15040012S01||iPad Mini 3||0.179||0.060||66.48%|
|Rad-Chip iPad Wi-Fi||RCHIPIPD/WF||MORLAB||SZ15040012S01||iPad 5||0.259||0.093||64.10%|
|Rad-Chip iPad Wi-Fi||RCHIPIPD/WF||MORLAB||SZ15040012S01||iPad Air 2||0.194||0.073||62.38%|
THE MEN BEHIND THE TECHNOLOGY.
Radio frequency engineer Aaron Leibovich is passionate about improving the safety of mobile phone communications.
He’s been involved with the intricacies of telecommunications equipment for almost 50 years, including extensive experience working with radio frequency equipment. It’s this understanding and interest in telecommunications that led Aaron to create a product that actually works in reducing mobile phone radiation with virtually no effect on your transmission signal or call reception.
Aaron began his impressive experience in electronics studying electronic engineering specialising in RF communication and aircraft navigation equipment. He began as an electronic engineer, working on a range of telecommunication and navigational systems, serving Israeli Airforce and many years working for the Israeli defence institute of armament development “RAFAEL”.
Aaron later set up and ran a number of his own extremely successful telecommunication businesses, constantly staying ahead of the ever-evolving electronics market. This long-term experience within the telecommunications industry gave Aaron an in-depth understanding of how mobile phones and wireless devices are designed, as well as an acute awareness of the precautionary measures taken by those who work with radio frequency.
Aaron and the Cellsafe Smartchip
When Aaron saw an increase in mobile phone use with no technology available to reduce radiation, he set to work developing the Smartchip solution. He began working with various materials and techniques that hadn’t been yet combined in such a way to develop the first CellSafe phone case. After endless modifications of the design and thorough laboratory testing, the resulting product was proven to reduce SAR by up to 74.2% Since then Aaron and his team has refined the smart technology to an adhesive radi-cushion and further still to the ultra-thin Cellsafe Smartchip, which is undetectable under a phone case with even better results, reducing SAR by Up to 95%.
“I met Aaron Leibovich in the late 1970s when he was a young engineer. Since then, Aaron mastered the profession in such depth to become one of the best experts today in Radio Frequency Engineering. After years of studies and research, his products and inventions are shaping the world’s most advanced devices for protecting people from RF radiation.”
Dr Aaron Shenhar (PhD Stanford), Fellow of NASA Science Council of Project Management Research.
What do the experts say about Cellsafe?
Leading Australian scientist Dr Don Maisch (PhD & Member of the Australasian College of Nutritional & Environmental Medicine (ACNEM). Involved in standard setting specific to possible health effects from exposure
to electromagnetic radiation (EMR) since 1993 & served on the Standards Australia committee for telecommunications EMR exposure standards) has said the following about the Cellsafe products
‘On January 25th, 2013 I released a paper titled The case for a precautionary public health policy for cell phone, smartphone and cordless phone use. This paper presented the evidence of health risks and gave advice on ways for people to reduce their cell and smartphone microwave exposure, but still allow them to use the technology.
One of my recommendations was the use of Cellsafe mobile phone cases as one of a number of ways to reduce exposure. This is because I am satisfied that use of this case does significantly reduce the specific absorption rate (SAR) into the head of the user. Before making this recommendation I have examined the test results as listed on the Cellsafe web site.’
World renown Australian brain surgeon Dr Vini Khurana (Professor of Neurosurgery at the Australian National University in Canberra) is also a supporter of the Cellsafe products.
Here you can see leading Australian Neurosurgeon Dr Charlie Teo’s most recent talk with Dr Devra Davis on his belief that mobile phones do in fact cause brain cancer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEfFkF1OHsY&sns=em